Chapter 4 (pp. 47-50)
Trespass or Offence?
So shall ye say unto Joseph, Forgive, I pray thee now, the trespass of thy brethren, and their sin; for they did unto thee evil: and now, we pray thee, forgive the trespass of the servants of the God of thy father. And Joseph wept when they spake unto him. – Genesis 50:17
I have here chosen the words “trespasser” and “trespassed” rather than “offender” and “offended,” because a trespass would still be a trespass even if the person trespassed against chose to not be offended by it. In other words, something can still be a trespass without it having been taken as an offence by the receiver. For example, if someone contemptuously spat in my face in the marketplace but I chose to smile at the person rather than spit back into their scorning and provocative face, my smile-response does not change their spitting aggression from being a trespass or an assault. If, on the other hand, I got angry, yelled violently at the attacker and hit them in the face, that is not what makes the initial provocation a bigger or lesser trespass. So, an action or non-action can still be a trespass without it having been taken as an offence by the person trespassed against. The reaction to a trespass does not entirely define the action of the trespass.
Jesus told a parable in which a prodigal son had requested his share of inheritance from the father, and gone off promptly to waste it in some unreachable distant “country” (Luke 15:11-32). Did the father take offence at the son’s action? No part of that story says so, yet the son saw no less need, when “he came to himself,” to return and repair a trespass in which there did not appear to have been an apparent family outrage or offence in the receiver of the trespass. In the story of Joseph also, Joseph wept when the trespassers spoke, but his tears did not mean that their initial action of betrayal had not been a trespass after all. Those tears were merely cleansers of a sad past. So, a person’s reaction to an action is not always the measure of whether or not that action was a trespass. Their reaction is merely an expression of their ability or inability to manage matters; it is not what describes the magnitude of the trespass. The fact that ‘he didn’t get angry, after all,’ or ‘she doesn’t take offence at such details’ does not mean that the action had been right; it only shows the largeness of heart of the one party. Their noble reaction speaks about them, not about the offence or the offender.
It is dangerous to take someone for granted and continue to trespass against them because they take no offence, or seem to take no offence. The day they cry, God will answer for them, and He could answer in ways very severe, as He once was forced to do for Moses who at the time was reputed to be the world’s meekest man (Numbers 12:3, 8-10).
For copies of the book, kindly call the contact numbers provided or visit the online shops listed below.
Other publications at Selar books:
I’m blessed sir.
The book Forgiveness is indeed a divine timeless classic.
It has blessed my life tremendously.
Thank you sir.
GOD bless you.